 The thing is, even if the film turned out to be good (which Domino really really isn’t), could Scott realistically take credit for its artistic success?  I mean, there’s no way he’s sitting on set watching six monitors so there’s no way he’s even seeing all the footage he’s getting.  (Dailies must be a fun little surprise for him.)  Of course, he guides the overall artistic vision for the film but it seems overly generous to think of him as an auteur despite the fact that his films have a very unique and distinctive look.
The thing is, even if the film turned out to be good (which Domino really really isn’t), could Scott realistically take credit for its artistic success?  I mean, there’s no way he’s sitting on set watching six monitors so there’s no way he’s even seeing all the footage he’s getting.  (Dailies must be a fun little surprise for him.)  Of course, he guides the overall artistic vision for the film but it seems overly generous to think of him as an auteur despite the fact that his films have a very unique and distinctive look.I guess what I’m saying is that with so much chaos swirling around and so many cameras shooting on so many different film stocks with so much crazy movement and quick cutting, what could possibly be the artistic thought behind the film? The only thing effectively conveyed by all this nonsense is a feeling of sensory overload and that things are moving very quickly. But that’s really all.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment