Sunday, June 29, 2008

WANTED – timur bekmambetov – 4.5 / 10

Anyone walking into a theater, paying their ten bucks and sitting down to watch Wanted knows that there’s not going to be anything subtle or terribly deep going on there. But I still don’t think that theoretical filmgoer is going to be very satisfied.

Yeah, the action is suitably over the top and entertaining in an I-can’t-believe-what-they-just-did sort of way but the film is hardly the nonstop action thrill ride that the trailers were promising. It takes a long time for the action to get going and once it does there are often long lulls in which nothing much of interest happens.

A lot of the failings of Wanted can be traced to the formulaic nature of the film and the complete predictability of its central mystery. Had they switched the actors playing the man who was supposed to be Wes’s (James McAvoy’s) dad and the man who really is his father, the reveal of this switcheroo might not have been so predictable. But, even if the actors had been switched, there’s just no getting around the film’s plot by arithmetic. Take the slow-mo action ballet of The Matrix, add an unbearably cool mentor with a secret (Angelina Jolie, interestingly playing the Brad Pitt part) teaching a office drone how to be cool a la Fight Club, tack on the ending of The Empire Strikes Back and viola, you get Wanted.

But the biggest failure of the film is that it never comes to grips with its own convoluted logic. A thousand years ago a secret society of weavers got together and decided to become assassins. Though the film never comes out and says it, these weavers must have figured out some way of making a mystical loom that weaves the names of targets in binary code. And all these generations later, the loom is still spitting out the names of people that the descendants of this secret society are supposed to murder. Oh, and somewhere along the way these people figured out how to curve bullets and developed super speed and agility and the ability to see in slow motion.

Actually, I really don’t have much of problem with that backstory. What I have a problem with is that it’s implemented in such a shoddy, haphazard way. It’s never explained why, if Wes had his powers all along, he never used them before. Yeah, he says that he misunderstood them to be panic attacks, but when he’s put into a stressful situation by Sloan (Morgan Freeman) and Fox (Angelina Jolie) he is immediately able to use his powers. It’s ridiculous to think that he never found himself in such a situation before and, if he had, he would have discovered these powers long ago. Plus, you would think a group of people like this would have been keeping a close eye on Wes his whole life lest he inadvertently reveal that super-powered people exist.

And then there’s the ending. Bekmambetov and his writers went out of their way to justify why Fox would kill herself and the rest of the secret society. She so completely believes in the powers of the mystical loom (because of what happened in her childhood) that when her name comes up she has no choice but to follow its directive. That said, Sloan’s name also came up on the loom. As did the names of every other assassin in the secret society. So, unless Fox’s name came up first (which seems unlikely since the only reason everyone’s name would have come up is because Sloan had them disregarding the targets given by the loom), the only reason she was ‘bad’ and needed killing was because of something Sloan did. So she killed herself totally out of blind loyalty to a mystical machine she doesn’t quite comprehend. And, despite the writers' contortions to make that work, I just can’t believe she would do that. I can’t believe someone would kill themselves that easily. Maybe kill the other assassins, but themselves? I don’t think so.

So, yeah, the action sequences are pretty nifty. But everything else in Wanted is either stupid or nonsensical. And since the action isn’t groundbreaking and only accounts for about a quarter of the film, there really isn’t much reason to see Wanted, except maybe to be able to trainspot the even lamer future action sequences that will rip off the two or three original parts of Wanted.

2 comments:

mr. jeremiah clark said...

there's SO much to hate about this movie but i'm going to limit my comment it to three.
first off, i can't think of a more ridiculous premise than a loom of fate that decides whether a person should live or die. it kills me that you "really don’t have much of problem with that backstory." come on, the loom of fate? what powered it back in the olden times, the water wheel of salvation? trying to unravel the logic that would go into such a device makes my brain hurt in a bad way.
the one thing i will say in favor of the film is that MAYBE timur bekmambetov was trying to say that it's as ridiculous for us to pray to an invisible god for salvation as it is for the assassins to look to something like a loom for direction on how to live their lives. like the assassins are us and the loom is God. if that's the case, then yay loom!..but i think i'm giving bekmambetov a little too much credit.
number two would be the final words of the film. while watching, i couldn't shake the feeling like i was being mocked throughout the entire movie. first i was indirectly told via the first 99% of the picture that i was quite pathetic because my job didn't involve killing people or a naked angelina jolie...only to be addressed and directly told in the last 1% by the main character that he used to be as pathetic as me but now he's badass (and, coincidentally, is able to miraculously defy the laws of physics with his bullets that travel miles without being affected by gravity); the movie then concludes with him by looking into the camera and asking the audience "what the fuck have you done lately?" jesus christ, get off my back you stupid little punk, as if i didn't hate you enough before.
what drives me up a wall most about WANTED is that these guys have such uncanny reaction times and aim with their pistols (?!?) that they are able to curve bullets, take out targets inside a building from a speeding train, and protect themselves from moving bullets by shooting them out of mid-air...and yet they miss so many goddamn times when shooting other principle characters.
i bet when morgan freeman is asked at a party why he got onboard with WANTED, he quickly mentions THE DARK KNIGHT and hopes no one comes back to that initial question.

john mirabella said...

the reason i don't have much of a problem with the backstory is because i thought of it as a bit of a macguffin. it really doesn't matter all that much what mechanism these people use to determine who to kill as long as they believe in it.

what really bothers me (other than what i mentioned above) is the ending where wes kills the bad guy (whose name is slipping my mind at the moment) as he stands on an 'x' of post-it notes. how does wes know that's where he's going to stand? how does he make sure that 'x' is there? is he going in there everyday to make a new one?

to me that's probably the most outright silly thing in the whole film.