I enjoyed Gone Girl
on every level on which it’s possible to enjoy a movie: as entertainment, as
comedy, as art, as a masterful display of filmmaking technique. It's a thriller that’s thrilling simply in
the bare fact of its existence. That a
film like this-- with this budget, this level of talent, produced and promoted
at this scale about this subject matter portrayed in this way-- exists at all
is thrilling in and of itself. That it also
succeeds on every level makes the whole thing one of the most enjoyable
experiences I've had at the movies in years and recalibrated my conception of
what's possible artistically and thematically in a big budget thriller. I'm pretty sure I was grinning like an idiot
for fifteen minutes after the credits rolled.
Why, then, are so many people having such a visceral negative
reaction to Gone Girl? I have a few ideas. I could be way off, of course, but I think
it's because the film cuts too close to the bone about topics (marriage,
feminism) that people are not particularly comfortable being forced to
reexamine, especially not by a movie that seemed from the marketing and
trailers to be just a run-of-the-mill 'adult thriller'.
Gone Girl
begins in a place we've seen over and over in countless films, television
shows, novels, etc. In the marriage of
Nick and Amy Dunne, Nick (Ben Affleck, putting his bland smugness to good use)
is the central figure, in control of where and what kind of life the couple
lives. This is the normal order of
things as far as mainstream entertainment is concerned and it has a lulling
effect on the audience. They settle in,
comfortable in the notion that they've seen this before, that there's nothing
new or challenging here.
Then the story kicks in.
Amy (Rosamund Pike) disappears under suspicious circumstances. Everyone starts to think Nick might be
involved and he tries desperately to prove his innocence. Again, this is a thriller set-up that's not
so very different from countless entertainments we've all seen / read many
times before. Sure, it's an incredibly
well-shot, edited and scored version of that set-up, but it's not fundamentally
new, different or challenging.
But just as the audience is settling into the familiar
rhythms of an 'adult thriller', Fincher pulls the rug out from under them by
revealing that not only is Amy alive, she's actively framing her husband for
her 'murder'. In other words, she's the
villain. And whatever lip service people
pay to the idea that women and men are equal, the reality of what that means in
practice (i.e. that women get to be screwed-up, evil monsters, just like men) isn't an idea they're all that comfortable with. And so, a film that had seemed pretty generic
(in both senses of the word), suddenly and without warning, gets a lot more
challenging and begins asking its audience some fairly prickly questions.
In revealing Amy's role as the mastermind behind it all
(cleverly skewering Nick's idea of himself (conveyed in an early scene where he
carries around a game of Mastermind)), Fincher and writer Gillian Flynn also
reveal that everything we've seen thus far of Amy and Nick's life together is
at best an exaggeration and at worst an outright lie. And so, what had for its first hour looked
like a straightforward mystery potboiler with the main female character in the
comfortable role of deified corpse has suddenly become a film in which nothing
we've seen can be trusted with a main female character who's a devious, lying
con artist. This is deeply unsettling.
And Gone Girl
only gets more challenging and more uncomfortable in its second half. Amy, after being robbed at the mountain motel
where she was hiding out, is forced to call upon Desi (Neil Patrick Harris), an
old boyfriend still creepily obsessed with her, for aid. It becomes clear fairly quickly that Desi's
been waiting years for just such a call.
And before long, Amy has effectively been imprisoned in his sterile,
high-tech lake house. As the reality of
her situation becomes clear, Gone Girl
starts asking the audience root for Amy.
Despite her role as the villain up until this point, she becomes sympathetic, suffering a fate worse than what she deserves.
We're now confronted with a situation in which not only
is the main female character a deceitful, duplicitous manipulator, we're also
feeling some sympathy for her. And then,
just when that sympathy is at its height and the audience is hoping she'll
escape Desi's clutches, Amy murders him in gruesome fashion, paying back our
empathy with horrifying brutality. This
is such a startling moment that the film itself breaks down. The soundtrack goes haywire; the image goes black
intermittently; the film itself reels.
It's an audacious moment in an audacious film and Fincher pulls it off
gloriously.
Now, having had their sympathies betrayed twice, the
audience wants Amy to be punished, to be found out and put in prison or for
Nick to murder her for real. And what
happens? Not only does she get away with
it all, she gets everything she always wanted: the great house, the perfect
nuclear family and a financial windfall in the form of book and movie deals. And that's just too much, one step too
far. People cannot forgive Gone Girl that. This lying, manipulating, murdering psycho
bitch cannot get away with it and end up happier than ever. No.
That is unacceptable. And they
reject the movie outright.
Of course, if you’re on Gone Girl's wavelength (as I clearly am), that ending is just awesome. In fact, I have a hard time thinking of a
better ending to a movie in the last few years.
It ends exactly as it should. It's
perfect.
So, okay, I just outlined a lot of reasons for disliking Gone Girl. Why do I like it so much (aside from that it
so cleverly manipulates its audience in a way I find incredibly bold and amusing)?
Well, for one thing, the level of filmmaking craft on
display here by David Fincher puts just about every other director working
today to shame. The way he composes
shots, moves the camera and edits everything together is masterful. He's operating with a precision that is
almost unheard of in a world where shaky handheld camerawork is used as
shorthand for emotional intensity and most directors' shot selection consists
of little more than a wide master shot and a couple close-ups. He's putting on a clinic in Gone Girl, and that's damn fun to
watch.
For the record, Fincher uses one handheld shot in the
entire film: when Nick runs from the crowd of reporters at Amy's vigil after
it's revealed she was pregnant. Fincher
clearly intends that shot as punctuation, to call attention to itself, to mark
it as the moment when Nick's glib, self-satisfied façade finally cracks. It's no coincidence the moment is staged to
make Nick look like a buffoon as he jogs awkwardly across a wide lawn toward a
waiting police car. He's finally been
knocked out of his comfortable, steadfast belief in his own superiority and Fincher
sells that with every choice he makes in that scene.
But that's barely scratching the surface of the depth of directorial craft evident here. Gone Girl is split roughly in half, with Nick being in control of the first half of the film and Amy in control of the second. Fincher emphasizes this in a lot of clever ways, for instance, the careful way in which he positions Nick in the frame. At the start of the film, he's positioned in the very center of the screen. But as the situation gets further and further out of his control, he's pushed farther and farther from the center, moving almost totally out of it in the second half, when Amy is in control. And he only gets back to the center again at the very end, when Amy has so totally taken control of his life that she can afford him a little autonomy.
There's also a marked difference in the way the first
half of the film sexualizes and objectifies its female characters and the way in which it refuses to do so, even going so far as to objectify the men, in the
second half. In the first half of the
film, Margo, Nick's twin sister, is introduced telling a particularly sexual
and not particularly funny joke. And
Nick's girlfriend Andie is introduced as a sex-obsessed bimbo who can't wait to
take her shirt off. But then, in the
second half of the film, this is flipped on its head. There's no female nudity. Even when Amy manipulates Desi into having
sex with her, she never removes her underwear. And then, upon returning home, she and Nick
have a scene in the shower in which Nick is shown full frontal (if only
momentarily) while Amy keeps her back steadfastly turned to the camera.
I could go on and on about Fincher's directorial skill
and the many brilliant ways it's employed here, but that's not enough by itself
to make Gone Girl a terrific
film. What really elevates it is the way
everything and everyone in the movie revolves around and plays off the same
theme: narrative, specifically the stories we tell about ourselves and each
other.
When you get right down to it, any individual's life is
just a collection of stories, stories they tell themselves and stories others
tell about them. Our lives are
narratives. So too is a marriage. Gone
Girl investigates this idea on a deep level, with every character and
storyline pinging off of it.
Amy's character reflects this theme most directly. Amy has never been
in control of the narrative of her own life.
She’s always been defined by other people. Growing up, Amy was the inspiration
for a series of books by her psychologist / author parents. Dubbed the 'Amazing Amy' series, these books didn't
simply chronicle Amy's life, they constantly improved upon Amy's real-life failures. When real Amy stopped playing the cello,
Amazing Amy became a prodigy. When real
Amy got cut from her school's volleyball team, Amazing Amy made varsity, etc.
etc. And thus, for her entire childhood
and much of her early adulthood, Amy existed primarily in dialogue with
her fictional doppelganger, the narrative of her life controlled by her parents
and their fictional creation.
Then Amy meets Nick, falls in love and gets married. Only it turns out Amy was playing at being a
person whom Nick would love. And when
she revealed her true self, he rejected her in favor of a younger
mistress. She was accepted as long as
she fit the narrative that Nick had in mind.
As soon as she didn't, as soon as she tried to stop defining herself by
what he wanted, he rejected her.
The events of Gone
Girl are, then, Amy attempting to take back control. By faking her own murder and turning herself
into a national martyr / hero, Amy is finally able to take charge of her own
narrative. But even then, after she's
worked so long on this plan and gone to such extremes, one mistake and she's at
the mercy of Desi, yet another person who wants to control her story (in
this case to turn her back into the person he loved in high school).
As Amy says in a monologue about the ways in which women
perform roles for the men they're with (the novel's famous 'Cool Girl' speech),
this lack of control of your own story is far too common. And something needs to be done about it-- probably
not what Amy actually did, but that she goes to such extremes and is only really
successful after committing a horrific murder says a lot about how difficult it
is for women to achieve that control.
Fincher advances this idea in other subtle ways as well. In the first half of the film, every word
Pike says as Amy is dubbed, as if the film itself won't let Amy speak for
herself and has to constantly tweak and correct everything she says, in other
words, to control her entirely.
All of the other characters are impacted by this theme as
well. Margo tells Nick, almost from the
moment Amy goes missing, that he has to be careful how he comes across, how
other people are going to see and define him.
She does this in almost every scene, whether she's telling him what to
wear or what to say or just worrying what people are going to think of him. Tanner Bolt, Nick's lawyer, attempts to
control the media and the stories they tell about Nick and Amy. The media, in turns, creates versions of Nick
and Amy that neither one recognizes.
This theme even plays a role in the police investigation of
Amy's disappearance and reappearance.
That the police appeared to have so badly botched the initial investigation
(eventually arresting Nick for a murder that never took place) makes it
impossible for them to fully investigate Amy's reappearance because the story
everyone is telling about them is that they're incompetent. And if the story is told often enough, it
becomes, for all intents and purposes, the truth.
On top of all that thematic richness, Gone Girl is also very very funny. Fincher and Flynn are very aware of how
absurd some of these situations are and they're not above getting a laugh out
of it. Whether it's Tanner lightly
joking with Nick not to piss Amy off after she returns or using 'Don’t Fear the
Reaper' on the soundtrack, Gone Girl
has a wicked sense of humor. But like
any good satire, it's best jokes also cut the deepest, making the laughter more than a little uncomfortable.
This is all fascinating, but Fincher is playing an even
deeper game here. Film itself is, of
course, a form of narrative storytelling.
So this theme of controlling narrative applies just as much to the film
itself as it does to the characters. One
of the jobs of a filmmaker is to manipulate the story to elicit specific
reactions in an audience. All the ways in
which Fincher and Flynn manipulate their audience, as outlined above, show how
effectively this can be achieved by people in command of their craft. They use the first half of the film to lull
the audience into thinking they're seeing a certain kind of film only to upend
everything halfway through. They continue
that manipulation by first getting the audience to sympathize with Amy despite
her role as the film's villain only to then completely betray that sympathy,
which in turn causes the audience to actively root against her. And then, of course, they betray the audience
one final time and let Amy get away with everything. They get the audience to trust them only to
continually defy and betray that trust.
This, Gone Girl
is saying to its audience, is what it's like to be Amy. She wants things to be a certain way, does
everything she can to make that happen, only to have her trust repeatedly
betrayed. That’s what the film itself
does to its audience. The first half of Gone Girl gets them to think
it's a certain kind of movie, to trust that it's going to follow a certain path
and resolve a certain way. And then that
trust is betrayed over and over again.
It's so deviously brilliant that I'm still in awe of it days later.
Gone Girl is as
good a film as could possibly be made about this theme and subject matter. It puts just about every other movie of its
kind to shame. This is some next level
shit. Gone Girl reminds me of just what the medium of film is
capable. It's a remarkable achievement. And that it's entered into the national conversation
currently underway about feminism thrills me to no end.
1 comment:
nice review thespoileralert.blogspot.com
Post a Comment